Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Case: 2023-29554
Closed: 3/21/2024
Case Details:
-
Violated patrol rules - failed to provide a business card
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Training
Case: 2021-23568
Closed: 10/30/2023
Case Details:
-
Improper use of force
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (10 days)
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications
Marchi, Milton vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 16CV07122,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, March 24, 2017, ended October 10, 2024
Administrative Closing
Complaint
Description: On September 28, 2015 Plaintiff Milton Marchi called for help when his home was burglarized. Mr. Marchi has Parkinson's disease. NYPD Officers Bennett Choi, Frank Talio, Matthew Peters, and Joseph Dean arrived. Officer Choi grabbed Mr. Marchi, struck him with an asp and began beating and kicking him. The remaining officers help Mr. Marchi down. Mr. Marchi was transported to Jamaica Hospital, and the officers claimed he was an emotionally disturbed person. Mr. Marchi was released from police custody at Jamaica Hospital without being charged with committing any crimes or offenses.