Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 4 known lawsuits, $33,001 total settlements.
Bradley, Shahleek vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 18CV05467,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, October 3, 2018, ended February 6, 2020
$21,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On February 25, 2016, Plaintiff Bradley was falsely arrested by Defendant Officers Cunningham and Rodriguez for alleged drug sales. Defendant officers maliciously persecuted Plaintiff Bradley without probable cause.
Toler, Ronald vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 16CV01345,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, March 18, 2016, ended November 30, 2016
$10,001 Settlement
Complaint,
Amended Complaint
Description: Plaintiff pulled into a parking spot when he was approached by Defendant Officers, ordered out of his car, searched, tightly handcuffed, brought to a local precinct, and charged with Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Second and Third Degrees. Plaintiff was incarcerated for approximately twelve (12) hours before the NYPD voided his arrest and released him from the precinct.
Davis, Tony vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 509512/2015,
Supreme Court - Kings, August 4, 2015, ended May 6, 2020
Administrative Closing
Agoro v. The City of New York et al
Case # 15CV07249,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
$1,500 Settlement
Complaint,
First Amended Complaint
Description: Plaintiff's boyfriend had an encounter with police after he left his apartment and gave the officer his address. Officers then went to the address, illegally entered and searched the apartment, arrested Plaintiff, took her to the 60th Precinct, and gave her a DAT for littering and resisting arrest, which were later dismissed.