Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Discourtesy: Word
Force: Physical force
Discourtesy: Word
Chandrapaul Temal
Badge #9572,
Asian Male
Police Officer at 90th Precinct Detective Squad since September 2025
Also served at
77th Precinct
Service
started January 2018,
made $179,000 last year,
Tax #965561
Lawsuit Settlements:
$75,000 Smallwood, Vaughn vs City of New York, et al., 2020 KCSC KCSC 511970/2020
View Details
$75,000 Smallwood, Vaughn vs City of New York, et al., 2020 KCSC KCSC 511970/2020
View Details
Complaints
3
Complaints
4
Allegations
2
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Exonerated
1
Unsubstantiated
Complaint #202100434,
January 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Command Discipline A |
| APU Plea Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 5 days |
| APU Case Status: | Closed: Resolved by plea, June 25, 2025 |
| Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 5 days / Command Discipline A |
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary |
| Complaint Closing Report | |
| NYPD Plea Agreement |
Complaint #201906247,
July 2019
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 26 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
Complaint #201810023,
December 2018
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 52 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
| Complaint #202100434, January 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | CCRB Conclusion | |
| Discourtesy: Word | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) | |
| Force: Physical force | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) | |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A | ||
| APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days | ||
| APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, June 25, 2025 | ||
| Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days / Command Discipline A | ||
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary | |
| Complaint Closing Report | ||
| NYPD Plea Agreement | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201906247, July 2019 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 26 | Exonerated |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201810023, December 2018 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint | Black Female, 52 | Unsubstantiated |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Smallwood, Vaughn vs City of New York, et al.Case # 511970/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, July 14, 2020, ended January 10, 2024
$75,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On November 27, 2019, Plaintiff was walking on the street on the way to the bus stop when he saw a friend. His friend is an individual who uses a wheelchair. Plaintiff gave his friend a t-shirt which his friend had previously asked Plaintiff to buy for him. Immediately when Plaintiff placed the t-shirt into his friend's wheelchair officers ran over and threw Plaintiff on the ground. The officers punched, kicked, and elbowed Plaintiff. Plaintiff was placed under arrest without cause. Plaintiff was illegally searched, during which no contraband was found. Plaintiff was transported to the precinct and charged with obstructing governmental administration. All charges were subsequently dismissed.