David L. Osbourne

Badge #5034, Black Male
Service started July 2002, ended October 2022, Tax #930889

Complaints

4 Complaints
6 Allegations
0 Substantiated
3 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200804016, March 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200703572, March 2007
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 13
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200606257, May 2006
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200603580, February 2006
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 13
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200804016, March 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 36 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200703572, March 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 13 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200606257, May 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 29 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 29 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #200603580, February 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 30 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Black Female, 13 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.