Rachid B. Lora

Badge #810, Hispanic Male
Sergeant at Transit Bureau District 4 since September 2015, active
Also served at 32nd Precinct
Service started January 2008, made $170,000 last year, Tax #945927

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest

Complaints

3 Complaints
18 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
14 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202001918, March 2020
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202001377, February 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #201201140, October 2011
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 43
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202001918, March 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Male, 40-44 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Male Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Male, 40-44 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Male Unsubstantiated
Offensive Language: Other White Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Offensive Language: Other Male, 40-44 Unsubstantiated
Offensive Language: Other Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Offensive Language: Other Male Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #202001377, February 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording White Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name White Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number White Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #201201140, October 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Female, 43 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Meighan, Akbar vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 159241/2019, Supreme Court - New York, September 26, 2019