Takiyah L. Trench

Takiyah L. Trench

Takiyah L. Trench
Badge #21413, Black Female
Police Officer at 41st Precinct since March 2019, active
Service started July 2006, made $149,000 last year, Tax #942620

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2016-15230
Closed: 3/2/2016
Case: 2012-7464
Closed: 10/24/2014

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
3 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202204024, June 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #201500446, January 2015
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 46
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201404093, December 2012
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant: Black Male, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202204024, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital Black Female, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #201500446, January 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Female, 46 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201404093, December 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Black Male, 39 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2016-15230
Closed: 3/2/2016
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on-duty, did fail and neglect to prepare the required arrest paperwork.
  2. Guilty: While on-duty, did fail and neglect to take police action.
  3. Guilty: While on-duty,did wrongfully make improper entries in activity log.
Penalty: Vacation days (20 days)

Case: 2012-7464
Opened: 11/15/2012
Closed: 10/24/2014
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Did knowingly associate with a person reasonably believed to be engaged in criminal activity
  2. Guilty: Having become aware of or receiving an allegation of corruption or serious misconduct involving a member of the service, did fail to immediately notify the Internal Affairs Bureau command center, as required
Penalty: Forfeiture of thirty (30) vacation days


Lawsuits

Jackson, Aries vs City of New York
Case # 803073/2022E, Supreme Court - Bronx, January 20, 2023