Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $85,000 total settlements.
Urena, Amaury vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 23CV06967,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, September 18, 2023
Urena, Amaury vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 004387/2023,
Supreme Court - Bronx, August 31, 2023
Randall, Sean, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 807662/2021E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, June 4, 2021, ended June 13, 2022
$85,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On March 16, 2021, defendant POs approached plaintiff when he was in the vicinity of Boston Road and East 175th Street. The plaintiff was arraigned after his arrest and thereafter falsely and maliciously prosecuted with committing a crime. The plaintiff remained incarcerated for over 24 hours and was required to make numerous court appearances over an extended period of time until all charges against him were terminated favorably.
