Wang Lou

Badge #3220, Asian Male
Former Sergeant at Fleet Services Division
Also served at 100th Precinct, Property Clerk Division, First Deputy Commissioner, Patrol Borough Manhattan North Task Force, 43rd Precinct
Service started July 2005, ended May 2023, Tax #938885

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2018-19073
Closed: 4/5/2019

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
10 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
6 Exonerated
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202001687, February 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201309069, September 2013
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Ethnicity
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200902702, February 2009
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202001687, February 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Hispanic Male, 36 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic Male, 36 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Hispanic Male, 36 Exonerated
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201309069, September 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Gender Hispanic Female, 28 Unsubstantiated
Offensive Language: Ethnicity Hispanic Female, 28 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Female, 28 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200902702, February 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 37 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 37 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 37 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 37 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2018-19073
Closed: 4/5/2019
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on-duty, failed to prepare a complaint report worksheet as required.
  2. Guilty: While on-duty, failed to conduct a thorough field investigation and refer said case to the detective squad for further investigation as required.
  3. Guilty: While on-duty, provided misleading statements during his official Department interview.
  4. Guilty: While on-duty, wrongfully transported an unauthorized civilian in a Department vehicle.
  5. Guilty: While on-duty, failed to maintain his activity log.
  6. Guilty: Conducted personal business while on duty.
  7. Guilty: While on-duty, made misleading statements during an official Department interview.
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), vacation days (30 days)