Natasha R. Friday

Natasha R. Friday

Natasha R. Friday
Lieutenant at Housing Borough Manhattan Impact Response Team since February 2023, active
Also served at Field Training Unit, Police Service Area 4, 40th Precinct, Police Service Area 5
Service started July 2001, made $200,000 last year, Tax #928322
Black Female, 46

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search

Complaints

8 Complaints
10 Allegations
3 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Instructions)
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
3 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201105324, April 2011
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201007681, June 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #200916223, August 2009
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: White Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Instructions)
Penalty: Instructions
additional details

Complaint #200907411, May 2009
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200816900, November 2008
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200806248, May 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Instructions)
Penalty: Instructions
additional details

Complaint #200407251, July 2004
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 50
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200302506, April 2003
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 32
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201105324, April 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Hispanic Male, 35 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #201007681, June 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Male Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 24 Substantiated (Charges)
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #200916223, August 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) White Male, 28 Substantiated (Instructions)
Penalty: Instructions
additional details
Complaint #200907411, May 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Female Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200816900, November 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 25 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200806248, May 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 44 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 44 Substantiated (Instructions)
Penalty: Instructions
additional details
Complaint #200407251, July 2004
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 50 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200302506, April 2003
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 32 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.