Mary E. Cunningham

Mary E. Cunningham

Mary E. Cunningham
Badge #17931, White Female, 40
Police Officer at 44th Precinct since June 2018, active
Service started July 2013, made $119,000 last year, Tax #954679

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Discourtesy: Word (2)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2019-20584
Closed: 6/21/2019

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$55,000   Edwards, Ramel vs City of New York, et al., 2017 BCSC BCSC 030790/2017E
$32,500   Vadi, Jean vs City of New York, et al., 2017 BCSC BCSC 025556/2017E
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
13 Allegations
3 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Complainant Unavailable
2 Exonerated
5 Unable to Determine
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202202380, April 2022
Allegation: Offensive Language: Ethnicity
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202103007, May 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201900058, December 2018
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Instructions
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201707288, September 2017
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Asian Male, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 32
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Asian Male, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #201705353, July 2017
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202202380, April 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Ethnicity Hispanic Male, 50-54 Unable to Determine
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 50-54 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 50-54 Unable to Determine
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 50-54 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Hispanic Male, 50-54 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202103007, May 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Female, 15-17 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201900058, December 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 27 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Instructions
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201707288, September 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Asian Male, 38 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Male, 32 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Asian Male, 38 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Male Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #201705353, July 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 22 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2019-20584
Closed: 6/21/2019
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Criminal association.
  2. Guilty: Made computer inquiries unrelated to official Department business.
  3. Guilty: Wrongfully disseminated confidential Department information.
  4. Guilty: Wrongfully disseminated confidential Department information. Made computer inquiries unrelated to official Department business..
Penalty: Vacation days (25 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits, $87,500 total settlements.

Ruiz, Alissa vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 805569/2022E, Supreme Court - Bronx, April 11, 2022

Edwards, Ramel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 030790/2017E, Supreme Court - Bronx, November 14, 2017, ended August 6, 2019
$55,000 Settlement

Vadi, Jean vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 025556/2017E, Supreme Court - Bronx, June 26, 2017, ended April 2, 2018
$32,500 Settlement