Warren R. Hutchinson

Warren R. Hutchinson

Warren R. Hutchinson
Badge #21648, White Male
Police Officer at Narcotics Borough Brooklyn North since May 2023, active
Also served at 75th Precinct
Service started July 2013, made $122,000 last year, Tax #954952

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-26935
Closed: 12/14/2022

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$30,000   Bowden, Cravon vs City of New York, et al., 2015 KCSC KCSC 510622/2015
$10,000   Richey, Lamont vs City of New York, et al., 2015 KCSC KCSC 009992/2015
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
10 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
2 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202204882, July 2022
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202104129, July 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202102042, March 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #201807074, August 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 58
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201602825, March 2016
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202204882, July 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Female, 45-49 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 45-49 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202104129, July 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 30-34 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202102042, March 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 21-24 Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #201807074, August 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Female, 58 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201602825, March 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 18 Complainant Uncooperative
Force: Chokehold Black Male, 18 Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26935
Closed: 12/14/2022
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules - failed to provide business card
  2. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Named in 5 known lawsuits, $40,000 total settlements.

Pryce, Rochelle vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 508703/2021, Supreme Court - Kings, April 14, 2021

Guevarro, Gillian vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 523457/2018, Supreme Court - Kings, December 20, 2018

Ross, Kwesi vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 18CV01340, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, March 8, 2018, ended March 18, 2022
Order/Judgment (Verdict)
Complaint
Description: On May 16, 2015 at around 5pm, officers approached Mr. Ross, an African-American man, and demanded his ID. Mr. Ross did not have his ID on him, but he explained that his mother who was nearby had his ID. The officers ignored him and arrested him, cuffing his hands tightly behind his back and ignoring his pleas not to cuff him so tightly because of a prior arm fracture. Mr. Ross was denied medical assistance despite being in excruciating pain. All charges against Mr. Ross were false and his arrest was subsequently voided. Mr. Ross was treated at a local hospital for a fractured metacarpal bone and facial abrasion.

Bowden, Cravon vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 510622/2015, Supreme Court - Kings, September 1, 2015, ended October 16, 2018
$30,000 Settlement

Richey, Lamont vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 009992/2015, Supreme Court - Kings, August 10, 2015, ended March 3, 2020
$10,000 Settlement

Other Documents