Joshua C. Ganshaw

Badge #8463, White Male
Police Officer at Strategic Initiatives Bureau since April 2026
Service started July 2018, made $149,000 last year, Tax #966072

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Gun Pointed
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) (2)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search

Discipline Cases:

Closed: 12/8/2023
Case: 1 Allegation
Case: 2022-26847
Closed: 8/30/2022

View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
10 Allegations
5 Substantiated
4 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202305113, June 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Gesture)
Complainant: White Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202204983, July 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Male, 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202103114, May 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, August 30, 2024
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details

Complaint #201909576, November 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: White Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Formalized Training
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, July 13, 2023
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Complaint #202305113, June 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Gesture) White Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202204983, July 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 10-14 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Male, 10-14 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202103114, May 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 45-49 Exonerated
Force: Gun Pointed Black Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, August 30, 2024
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details
Complaint #201909576, November 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) White Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Formalized Training
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, July 13, 2023
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Closed: 12/8/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongful search of an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case: 2022-26847
Closed: 8/30/2022
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Wrongfully searched an individual known to the Department.
  2. Guilty: Wrongfully searched a vehicle.
Penalty: Training


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits.

Brown, Alain vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 503731/2023, Supreme Court - Kings, February 7, 2023
Complaint
Description: On June 15, 2021, Plaintiff was lawfully present in his parked vehicle when NYPD Officers surrounded Plaintiff's vehicle with their guns drawn. The Officers present included Ronny R. Valdez and John Tripodi, as well as other Officers. There was no warrant for Plaintiff's arrest and the Defendant Officers did not have any cause to believe Plaintiff had committed a crime. Without warning, Plaintiff heard what sounded like a firearm being discharged, so he fled in his vehicle. Defendant Officers, including Valdez and Tripodi, pursued Plaintiff at high speed. The vehicle operated by Valdez and Tripodi rammed into the rear of Plaintiff's vehicles several times. Defendants purused Plaintiff through residential street...

Rdk Ny D/b/a Green Angel Cbd, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 518387/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, October 1, 2020
Complaint
Description: On November 2, 2019, Oren Levy, the owner of RDK NY Inc., a company dealing in hemp products, ordered 106 pounds of hemp from Fox Holler Farms in Vermont. The shipment was sent via Federal Express to be delivered to his brother, Ronen Levy, due to Oren being hospitalized at the time. However, the shipment was initially confiscated by Vermont police based on the suspicion that it contained marijuana. After Oren clarified the legal nature of the shipment, the Vermont police cleared the package for delivery. Despite this clearance, the shipment was flagged again by Federal Express and reported to the NYPD. Officers from the 75th Precinct, including Rodney Greenidge and Joshua Ganshaw, seized the package and refus...

Rdk Ny D/b/a Green Angel Cbd, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 21CV01529, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, October 1, 2020
Complaint
Description: On November 2, 2019, the NYPD improperly confiscated 106 pounds of hemp products on the presumption that the shipment contained marijuana instead. Plaintiffs had lawfully ordered the hemp products as part of his business, but the actions of Officers Rodney Greenidge, Joshua Ganshaw, and a John Doe officer caused Plaintiffs to be deprived of their business and livelihood. While Plaintiff Ronen Levy was at the 75th Precinct voluntarily, the Defendant officers approached him and falsely arrested him. Plaintiff Ronen Levy was handcuffed and placed in a holding area at the precinct until 2:30 a.m. the following day, where he was transferred to Kings County Central Booking and released at approximately 8 p.m. Plainti...

Other Documents