Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Case: 2022-26483
Closed: 5/2/2024
Case Details:
-
Violated patrol rules.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, vacation days (2 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Case: 2022-26483
Closed: 5/2/2024
Case Details:
-
Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Other
Case: 2022-25174
Closed: 5/1/2024
Case Details:
-
Failed to timely activate body worn camera.
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Other
Torres, Herbert vs The City of Ny, et al.
Case # 502483/2024,
Supreme Court - Kings, March 21, 2024
Complaint
Description: The complaint details two incidents involving the plaintiff's interactions with NYPD officers referred to as Brovakos I and Brovakos II. In the first incident on November 3, 2020, the plaintiff was arrested without cause after briefly stopping to see a friend. The officers demanded his driver's license, accused him of parking in a no-standing zone, and then escalated the situation by forcibly removing him from his vehicle, conducting a warrantless search, and physically assaulting him. Despite no contraband being found, the plaintiff was detained, strip-searched, and falsely charged with various crimes, which were later dismissed in court.
In the second incident on January 24, 2021, a similar pattern occurred....