Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits.
Watson, Shaking J. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 507654/2024,
Supreme Court - Kings, March 26, 2024
Complaint
Description: On or about April 26th, 2023, PO Kevin Caban and PO "John Doe" approached Plaintiff while he was lawfully on the street. PO Caban handcuffed Plaintiff and took him to the precinct where he was imprisoned for several hours. Plaintiff was released without being charged with a crime. Plaintiff was then issued a baseless traffic ticket.
Stokes, Hasan vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 534910/2023,
Supreme Court - Kings, November 30, 2023
Complaint
Description: On October 26, 2022, plaintiff was arrested by the defendants without probable cause or legal justification. On this day, a friend of plaintiff was arrested and taken to a nearby precinct. Plaintiff, fearing for his friend’s safety, stepped back and attempted to film the arrest. Later, plaintiff was approached by the defendant officers. Defendants began to arrest plaintiff, subjecting him to unlawful pat-down search and tightly restraining him with metal handcuffs causing pain and discomfort. Plaintiff did not resist arrest. Nevertheless, Plaintiff was unlawfully arrested and handcuffed by the defendant officers without legal justification or probable cause. Thereafter, defendants transported plaintiff ...