Joshua T. Christel

Joshua T. Christel

Joshua T. Christel
Badge #17529, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 110th Precinct since December 2021
Service started May 2021, made $82,000 last year, Tax #971753

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera

Complaints

3 Complaints
4 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Complaint Withdrawn
2 Victim Unidentified

Complaint #202604986, April 2026
Allegation: Force: Vehicle
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202508133, July 2025
Allegation: Offensive Language: Sexual orientation
CCRB Conclusion: Victim Unidentified
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Victim Unidentified
additional details

Complaint #202303046, April 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202604986, April 2026
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Vehicle Hispanic Male, 15-17 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #202508133, July 2025
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Sexual orientation Victim Unidentified
Discourtesy: Word Victim Unidentified
additional details
Complaint #202303046, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Persad, Christopher vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 719023/2023, Supreme Court - Queens, September 19, 2023
Complaint
Description: On December 31, 2022, plaintiff was arrested by defendants. Plaintiff was standing at a platform waiting for a train when defendants approached him and began to issue him a summons for smoking. Plaintiff denied having been smoking, as a response to which the defendants s forcefully grabbed his arms and tightly restrained him with metal handcuffs causing him pain, discomfort and humiliation. Thereafter, he was dragged down the stairs and unlawfully searched. Having recovered nothing illegal from his person, the defendants then uncuffed him, lifted him from both sides and threw him out of the door. Additional defendants waiting outside the train station then approached plaintiff, surrounded him and proceede...