Dexter J. Ortiz

Dexter J. Ortiz

Dexter J. Ortiz
Badge #17405, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at Bronx North Auto Larceny Unit since May 2026
Also served at 49th Precinct, Patrol Borough Bronx Specialized Units
Service started October 2018, made $193,000 last year, Tax #966753

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk (2)
Abuse of Authority: Question
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Discourtesy: Word

Lawsuit Settlements:
$7,500   James, Kendale vs City of Ny, et al., 2023 BCSC BCSC 817574/2023E
$75,000   Rodriguez, Angel vs City of Ny, et al., 2023 BCSC BCSC 811814/2023E
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
13 Allegations
5 Substantiated
5 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
6 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202500639, January 2025
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Formalized Training)
additional details

Complaint #202308611, September 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202303129, April 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202500639, January 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Formalized Training)
additional details
Complaint #202308611, September 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 18-20 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #202303129, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 40-44 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $82,500 total settlements.

James, Kendale vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 817574/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, November 6, 2023, ended April 22, 2025
$7,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On August 27, 2023, Plaintiff was lawfully in the vicinity of Eastchester Road and East 223rd Street in the Bronx. Plaintiff was doing nothing illegal, improper or acting suspicious in anyway. Defendant officers, absent an arrest warrant, probable cause, reasonable suspicion or any legal justification, approached Plaintiff for no reason. Defendant officers summarily stopped, searched, grabbed, assaulted, battered and detained him in an aggressive and excessive manner. Plaintiff was subsequently arraigned after his arrest and thereafter falsely and maliciously prosecuted. Plaintiff had his fingerprints and photographs taken without his consent and held him on various criminal charges at various police stations, ...

Rodriguez, Angel vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 811814/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, August 3, 2023, ended January 19, 2024
$75,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On March 17, 2023, Defendant officers Rosario, Ortiz, Defossett, Doe and Roe were on duty in the area of Crotona Avenue and East 178th Street in the Bronx. Without an arrest warrant, probable cause, reasonable cause or any legal justification, the Defendant officers approached Angel Rodriguez, and stopped, searched, grabbed, assaulted, battered, and detained him in an excessive manner. Plaintiff was arraigned after his arrest and maliciously prosecuted. Thereafter, Plaintiff Rodriguez remained incarcerated for over twenty-four hours and required to make numerous court appearances before all charges against him were terminated favorably.