Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $2,245,000 total settlements.
Charles, Lennohn vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 020198/2012,
Supreme Court - Kings, October 24, 2012, ended April 19, 2017
$1,900,000 Settlement
Walker, Ronald vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 11CV00314,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, January 24, 2011, ended September 12, 2014
$95,000 Settlement
Brooks, Eric R. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 002228/2010,
Supreme Court - Kings, January 27, 2010, ended October 14, 2015
$250,000 Settlement
