Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (6)
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (6)
Hilton Jeanpierre
Lieutenant at 70th Precinct since August 2025
Service
started July 2006,
made $168,000 last year,
Tax #941954
Black Male, 44
Discipline Cases:
Case: 2019-21561
Closed: 11/8/2023
Case: 2023-28875
Closed: 11/1/2023
Case: 2010-523
Closed: 4/27/2010
View Details
Lawsuit Settlements:
$75,000 Cochran, Deval, et Al vs City of New York, et al., 2020 KCSC KCSC 522757/2020
$40,000 Rivera, Selena, et al. vs City of New York, et al., 2018 EDNY EDNY 17CV06674
View Details
$75,000 Cochran, Deval, et Al vs City of New York, et al., 2020 KCSC KCSC 522757/2020
$40,000 Rivera, Selena, et al. vs City of New York, et al., 2018 EDNY EDNY 17CV06674
View Details
Complaints
8
Complaints
20
Allegations
7
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
2
Substantiated (Charges)
4
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Closed - Pending Litigation
1
Complainant Uncooperative
2
Exonerated
2
Unable to Determine
7
Unfounded
Complaint #202310741,
October 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #202306084,
July 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Rank Designation |
| Complainant: | Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Female, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Dismissed |
| APU Plea Penalty: | Command Discipline B 5 days |
| APU Case Status: | Closed: Plea set aside, Without discipline, October 22, 2025 |
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary |
| Complaint Closing Report | |
| NYPD Plea Agreement |
Complaint #202202734,
April 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
Complaint #202007501,
November 2020
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #201901685,
February 2019
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 50 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Command Discipline B |
| APU Plea Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 6 days |
| APU Case Status: | Closed: Resolved by plea, October 30, 2023 |
| Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 6 days / Command Discipline B |
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary |
| Complaint Closing Report | |
| NYPD Plea Agreement |
Complaint #201900192,
January 2019
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions) |
| Penalty: | Instructions |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
Complaint #201603947,
May 2016
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Stop |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
Complaint #200706660,
May 2007
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 57 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Complaint #202310741, October 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Female, 21-24 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202306084, July 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop | Black Male, 18-20 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Black Male, 18-20 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Rank Designation | Male, 18-20 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Black Male, 18-20 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) | |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Female, 21-24 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Black Male, 18-20 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) | |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed | ||
| APU Plea Penalty: Command Discipline B 5 days | ||
| APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Without discipline, October 22, 2025 | ||
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary | |
| Complaint Closing Report | ||
| NYPD Plea Agreement | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202202734, April 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 21-24 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202007501, November 2020 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Black Female, 40-44 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Black Female, 45-49 | Unfounded |
| Force: Physical force | Black Female, 45-49 | Exonerated |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Black Female, 45-49 | Unfounded |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Female, 45-49 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201901685, February 2019 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Black Female, 50 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Substantiated (Charges) | |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B | ||
| APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 6 days | ||
| APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, October 30, 2023 | ||
| Penalty: Forfeit vacation 6 days / Command Discipline B | ||
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary | |
| Complaint Closing Report | ||
| NYPD Plea Agreement | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201900192, January 2019 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Black Male, 30 | Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions) |
| Penalty: Instructions | ||
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201603947, May 2016 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Stop | Black Male, 44 | Exonerated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #200706660, May 2007 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number | Black Female, 57 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2019-21561
Closed: 11/8/2023
Case Details:
- Failed to provide a business card
- Improper entry into a premise
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (6 days)
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications
Case: 2023-28875
Closed: 11/1/2023
Case Details:
- Pleaded Guilty: Failed to notify the radio dispatcher about a vehicle pursuit and improper vehicle pursuit.
- Pleaded Guilty: Made an inaccurate statement during an official Department interview.
Penalty: Vacation days (30 days)
Case: 2010-523
Closed: 4/27/2010
Case Details:
- Guilty: Engaged in a physical altercation with a person known to the Department.
- Guilty: Knowingly associated with a person or organization reasonably to be engaged in, likely to engage in or have engaged in criminal activities.
- Guilty: Was aware of a purported allegation of corruption or serious misconduct involving members of the service, to wit: said officer was served with an order of protection. Said Police Officer failed and neglected to notify his Commanding Officer and/or the Internal Affairs Bureau command center as required..
- Guilty: Wrongfully entered a precinct cell block to interact with a person known to the Department in police custody for personal gain.
Penalty: Counseling, pre-trial suspension days (30 days), vacation days (5 days)
Lawsuits
Named in 4 known lawsuits, $115,000 total settlements.Castillo, Fernando Luna vs Police Officer Romero, Jimmy, et al.
Case # 525726/2023, Supreme Court - Kings, December 18, 2023
Complaint
Description: On June 25, 2022, while plaintiff was a pedestrian at a street, police officers Jimmy Romero (Sheild No. 5558), Francesco Scalici (Sheild No. 7889), Sajiad Asar (Sheild No. 16889), Hilton Jeanpierre (Sheild No. 1205), and other police officers engaged in a high speed chase in pursuit of a motor vehicle. The officers’ pursuit caused, permitted, and allowed the chased vehicle to strike and collide into several vehicles and pedestrians, including the plaintiff.
Butts, Rasheen vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 524741/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, December 11, 2020
Complaint
Description: On July 4, 2019, Plaintiff was involved in a traffic accident in Brooklyn. Defendant Officers Jimmy Romero and Hilton Jeanpierre, as well as up to ten unnamed Defendant Officers, arrived at the scene. Because of Plaintiff's race, religion, national origin, ethnicity or other improper characteristics, the Defendant Officers began to illegally question and search Plaintiff, without cause. Defendant Officers forced Plaintiff's arm behind his back and handcuffed him, refusing to loosen the handcuffs when Plaintiff complained they were too tight, which caused swelling, bruising and loss of feeling in Plaintiff's wrists. Defendant Officers then transported Plaintiff to the 81st Precinct and continued to search Plain...
Cochran, Deval, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 522757/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, November 19, 2020, ended March 14, 2024
$75,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On November 20, 2019, at 6:00a.m., Defendant Officers executed a no-knock search warrant at the Plaintiffs' home in Brooklyn. Plaintiffs, including 2 infant children, were terrifyingly awakened from their sleep as Defendants P.O Gerald Casciola, Capt. Adeel Rana, Sgt. Hilton Jean-Pierre and at least 6 other NYPD Emergency Services Unit members broke down the door and entered in military-style uniforms and gear, including machine guns that were pointed at the Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs were handcuffed and detained for 3 hours while the NYPD searched them and their home, property, and personal effects. Prior to November 20, 2019, the no-knock search warrant was obtained under false pretenses and with information fr...
Rivera, Selena, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 17CV06674, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, February 14, 2018, ended May 13, 2019
$40,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Plaintiffs were at their home when defendant officers entered it, frisked them, and arrested one Plaintiff using excessive force. Plaintiff was brought to the 100th precinct, charged with Obstructing Governmental Administration, Resisting Arrest, and Disorderly Conduct, which were later dismissed.