Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Discourtesy: Word
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Discourtesy: Word
John T. Przybyszewski
Badge #29776,
White Male
Service
started July 2018,
made $60,600 last year,
Tax #966284
Complaints
3
Complaints
9
Allegations
3
Substantiated
3
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Exonerated
4
Unable to Determine
1
Unsubstantiated
Complaint #202207913,
November 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 55-59 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment |
| Complainant: | Female, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | White Male, 55-59 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | White Male, 55-59 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
Complaint #202106456,
September 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Command Discipline A |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) |
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Dismissed |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Command Discipline A |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital |
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| APU Plea Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 3 days |
| APU Case Status: | Closed: Plea set aside, Comm. Disc. A, March 2024 |
| Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 2 days / Command Discipline A |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
Complaint #201907942,
September 2019
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 59 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Complaint #202207913, November 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | White Male, 55-59 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment | Female, 50-54 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | White Male, 55-59 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | White Male, 55-59 | Unable to Determine |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202106456, September 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | Male, 35-39 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A | ||
| Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) | Male, 35-39 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed | ||
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Male, 35-39 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A | ||
| Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital | Male, 35-39 | Exonerated |
| APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days | ||
| APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Comm. Disc. A, March 2024 | ||
| Penalty: Forfeit vacation 2 days / Command Discipline A | ||
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201907942, September 2019 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | White Male, 59 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.