Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $7,500 total settlements.
Alleyne, Alexandre vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 810980/2025E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, May 27, 2025, ended June 16, 2026
$7,500 Settlement
Clarke, Zion vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 155129/2025,
Supreme Court - New York, April 22, 2025
Walker, Isaiah vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 153486/2024,
Supreme Court - New York, May 31, 2024
Complaint
Description: On January 13, 2023, the plaintiff was driving when he was unlawfully stopped, detained, assaulted, seized and searched without probable cause by the defendant POs including PO Franklin Garrido. After stopping the plaintiff, the defendants falsely accused the plaintiff of crimes and violently and aggressively grabbed the plaintiff's head and body. They then aggressively shoved their hands into his clothes and intimate areas and without probable cause or a search warrant searched the car before violently contorting his arms and wrists behind his back and handcuffing him tightly. The plaintiff was then taken to the 73rd Precinct where he was fingerprinted, photographed and strip-searched along with a cavity sear...