Tiagom V. Reis

Badge #4899, Hispanic Male
Sergeant at 114th Precinct since April 2026
Also served at 84th Precinct
Service started January 2019, made $157,000 last year, Tax #967286

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Discourtesy: Action
Offensive Language: Other

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-27396
Closed: 3/17/2023

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$156,500   Sherwood, Justin vs City of Ny et al., 2022 EDNY EDNY 22CV07505
View Details

Articles

City Pays $150K to Settle Suit Over Cops Who Harassed Man Who Reported Police Parking Misconduct, Streetsblog, 9/28/2023

Complaints

4 Complaints
11 Allegations
3 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
4 Unsubstantiated
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202500408, December 2024
Allegation: Force: Gun fired
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202306117, July 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: White Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: White Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 1 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, February 24, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 1 days / Command Discipline A
additional details

Complaint #202105205, August 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Age 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Age 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 1 day)
additional details

Complaint #202103778, June 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202500408, December 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun fired Black Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202306117, July 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 55-59 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording White Male, 55-59 Unfounded
Offensive Language: Other White Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 55-59 Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 1 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, February 24, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 1 days / Command Discipline A
additional details
Complaint #202105205, August 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Age 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Action Age 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 1 day)
additional details
Complaint #202103778, June 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-27396
Closed: 3/17/2023
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
  2. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (1 day)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits, $156,500 total settlements.

Barrett, David & Douglas, Maegan vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 529090/2024, Supreme Court - Kings, December 19, 2024
Complaint
Description: On or about July 31, 2023 Plaintiffs Barrett and Douglas were in a car with their minor children, with Plaintiff Barret in the driver's seat. As they were traveling POs Vahid Hodzic, Conor McGouran, Julio Acuria, Justin Suarez, Franddy Duran, Karl Virn Williams, Alyssa Strong, Tiagom Reis, and John and Jane Does 1-12 suddenly used their police car to block and surround Plaintiff's car. POs ordered documentation and, when provided, ordered Plaintiff Barrett out of the vehicle. Plaintiff Barrett asked why and POs purposefully shattered the driver's side window and dragged him out of the vehicle. They also pulled one of the children out of the passenger cheat. Plaintiff Barrett was thrown to the ground multiple ti...

Sherwood, Justin vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 23CV00282, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, January 19, 2023, ended February 10, 2023
Zero Disposition
Complaint

Sherwood, Justin vs City of Ny et al.
Case # 22CV07505, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, December 16, 2022, ended September 28, 2023
$156,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On August 13, 2021, the Plaintiff received a phone call from PO Reis after filing complaints regarding illegally parked vehicles near the 84th Precinct. On August 26, 2021, the Plaintiff made additional complaints. Soon after, Det. Sturman called the Plaintiff, and an argument occurred between the two parties ending with Det. Sturman telling the Plaintiff "Stop calling, dickhead!" On September 10, 2021, the Plaintiff noticed several illegally parked vehicles again, and submitted photographs/separate complaints to NYPD. PO Madera pretended to be a NYC 311 operator (the service that receives the initial complaints) and told the Plaintiff he might be banned from submitting additional complaints going forward. On...

Other Documents

Employment History Summary