Timothy M. Breheny

Timothy M. Breheny

Timothy M. Breheny
Badge #7943, White Male
Police Officer at Patrol Borough Bronx North Neighborhood Safety Team since May 2026
Also served at Patrol Borough Bronx Public Safety Teams, 43rd Precinct, Patrol Borough Bronx Specialized Units, Patrol Borough Bronx Neighborhood Safety Team
Service started October 2015, made $179,000 last year, Tax #959508

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Failure to Explain
Abuse of Authority: Stop

Lawsuit Settlements:
$60,000   Moore, Sheldon vs City of Ny, et al., 2023 BCSC BCSC 820493/2023E
$15,000   Reyes, Alfredo vs City of Ny, et al., 2021 SDNY SDNY 21CV07621
View Details

Complaints

11 Complaints
22 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Alleged Victim Unavailable
2 Closed - Pending Litigation
2 Complainant Uncooperative
9 Unable to Determine
2 Unfounded
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202602337, March 2026
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202501541, February 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202500292, January 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202408348, August 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to Explain
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202403222, March 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202308422, September 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202306238, June 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202305240, June 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202302205, March 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202301864, February 2023
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202301208, February 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202602337, March 2026
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 25-29 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202501541, February 2025
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202500292, January 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 25-29 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202408348, August 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to Explain Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202403222, March 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Male, 25-29 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202308422, September 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202306238, June 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202305240, June 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202302205, March 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202301864, February 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202301208, February 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 5 known lawsuits, $75,000 total settlements.

Pesante, Mason vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 808612/2025E, Supreme Court - Bronx, April 17, 2025

Chance, Dexter vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 817434/2024E, Supreme Court - Bronx, November 4, 2024
Complaint
Description: On October 22, 2023, the plaintiff was lawfully in the vicinity of Roosevelt Avenue and East Tremont Avenue in the Bronx when the defendants, NYPD Officers Breheny, Riley, Doe, and Roe, approached the plaintiff without probable cause or reasonable suspicion. The officers searched and grabbed the plaintiff and transported him to a facility where he was kept incarcerated for over 24 hours. Thereafter, the plaintiff was falsely and maliciously prosecuted for allegedly committing a crime. After making several court appearances, the plaintiff ultimately had all charges against him dropped.

Moore, Sheldon vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 820493/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, December 27, 2023, ended May 2, 2025
$60,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 2, 2023, at approximately 1:00 a.m., Sheldon Moore was lawfully in the area of Davidson Avenue and West 174th Street in Bronx County. Absent a warrant, probable cause, or any legal justification, Defendant officers Breheny, Bowman, Doe and Roe, stopped, searched, grabbed, assaulted, battered and detained Mr. Moore in an excessive manner. Mr. Moore was arraigned after his arrest and thereafter falsely and maliciously prosecuted with committing a crime. Ultimately, all charges against him were terminated favorably but not before he was incarcerated for over twenty-four hours and required to make numerous court appearances.

Reyes, Alfredo vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 21CV07621, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, September 14, 2021, ended April 21, 2022
$15,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On July 6, 2018, plaintiff was in his home. His son punched him in the face and plaintiff's fiancee and her son intervened to prevent any further conflict. Plaintiff never struck his son in any way or threatened to. Multiple family members witnessed the incident. One of plaintiff's son's called the police and ten unidentified officers arrived, including Officers Goodman, Imbert, Hernandez, and Breheny. Officers entered the backyard, where plaintiff was, without consent or a warrant. Some of the officers entered the interior of the home from the backyard without consent or warrant. Some of the officers made jokes that plaintiff should pretend to fall down and sue the owner of the property. Plaintiff tried to exp...

Uraje, Jose vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 804139/2021E, Supreme Court - Bronx, April 13, 2021
Complaint
Description: On May 11, 2020, Plaintiff was lawfully at or about the premises known as 551 St. Lawrence Avenue, when he was approached, assaulted and battered by the Defendants, including POs Timothy Brehen and Bobby Baker. The assault and battery consisted of being jumped on, tackled to the ground, was assaulted by a Taser and/or other conductive energy device and then forcefully placed in handcuffs. The plaintiff was falsely arrested and taken to the 43th Precinct where he was held in a holding cell for a period of time. While at the premises, the plaintiff requested medical attention as a result of the injuries sustained by the Defendants, but was ignored.