Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 4 known lawsuits.
Toney, Jhisia, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 535341/2023,
Supreme Court - Kings, December 7, 2023
Robinson, Ikeda vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 519441/2023,
Supreme Court - Kings, July 6, 2023
Johnson, Lawrence vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 501418/2023,
Supreme Court - Kings, March 16, 2023
Graham, Naeem, et Al vs Nypd Police Officer Barna, Ryan V., Shield No. 29699, et al.
Case # 522550/2022,
Supreme Court - Kings, February 22, 2023
