Ryan V. Barba

Ryan V. Barba

Ryan V. Barba
Badge #29699, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at Internal Affairs Bureau since May 2024, active
Also served at 67th Precinct
Service started January 2018, made $77,400 last year, Tax #964908

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2024-30324
Closed: 4/22/2024
Case: 2021-23850
Closed: 11/1/2023
Case: 2022-26072
Closed: 6/16/2022

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
7 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202207944, November 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202002396, March 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #201907564, August 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Without discipline, December 2023
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Complaint #202207944, November 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Other Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202002396, March 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 30-34 Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #201907564, August 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Without discipline, December 2023
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2024-30324
Closed: 4/22/2024
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case: 2021-23850
Closed: 11/1/2023
Case Details:
  1. Threatened to use force.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications

Case: 2022-26072
Closed: 6/16/2022
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully frisked an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Named in 4 known lawsuits.

Toney, Jhisia, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 535341/2023, Supreme Court - Kings, December 7, 2023

Robinson, Ikeda vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 519441/2023, Supreme Court - Kings, July 6, 2023

Johnson, Lawrence vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 501418/2023, Supreme Court - Kings, March 16, 2023

Graham, Naeem, et Al vs Nypd Police Officer Barna, Ryan V., Shield No. 29699, et al.
Case # 522550/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, February 22, 2023

Other Documents