Derrick Mcintosh

Badge #8849, Black Male, 48
Police Officer at Patrol Borough Brooklyn North Specialized Units since November 2023, active
Service started January 2005, made $107,000 last year, Tax #937068

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Discourtesy: Action

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2017-17198
Closed: 3/22/2017

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$24,000   Farmer v. The City of New York et al, SDNY SDNY 07CV02982
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
10 Allegations
3 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
3 Exonerated
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201702111, March 2017
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, September 2019
Penalty: Suspension 15 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201201237, January 2012
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
Complainant: Black Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant: Black Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201005754, April 2010
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant: Black Female, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200614641, October 2006
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Black Male, 20
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 20
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200512873, September 2005
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201702111, March 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 33 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Hispanic Male, 33 Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Action Hispanic Male, 33 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, September 2019
Penalty: Suspension 15 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201201237, January 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Pepper spray Black Male, 34 Exonerated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 34 Unsubstantiated
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Black Male, 34 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201005754, April 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Black Female, 41 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200614641, October 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Black Male, 20 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 20 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200512873, September 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 34 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2017-17198
Closed: 3/22/2017
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on duty, failed to conduct o proper investigation into a matter, safeguard the crime scene and prepare a complaint report worksheet as required.
  2. Guilty: While on duty, wrongfully exhibited discourtesy towards a handcuffed and shackled individual by spitting towards said individual
Penalty: Pre-trial suspension days (15 days), restoration of suspension days (15 days)


Lawsuits

Farmer v. The City of New York et al
Case # 07CV02982, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
$24,000 Settlement
Amended Complaint, Stipulation

Other Documents