Joel E. Allen

Badge #25710, Black Male
Police Officer at Patrol Borough Brooklyn North Community Response Team since November 2023, active
Also served at Patrol Borough Brooklyn South Impact Response Team, 68th Precinct, Patrol Borough Staten Island
Service started January 2008, made $129,000 last year, Tax #945468

Lawsuit settlements:
$950,000   H.,d., et al. vs The City of New York, et al., 2016 SDNY SDNY 16CV07698
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
10 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Exonerated
2 Unable to Determine
5 Unfounded
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202204675, July 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #201100132, December 2010
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Asian Male, 46
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200917847, November 2009
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202204675, July 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Chokehold Black Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30-34 Unfounded
Force: Restricted Breathing Black Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30-34 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 30-34 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #201100132, December 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Asian Male, 46 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200917847, November 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 37 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

H.,d., et al. vs The City of New York, et al.
Case # 16CV07698, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, October 3, 2016, ended April 10, 2019
$950,000 Settlement
Complaint, Amended Complaint
Description: Class action by LAS challenging the constitutionality of NYPL 240.37-Loitering for the Purposes of Engaging in a Prostitution Offense. Contact Cynthia for more information on the defendants.