Tyler G. Morales

Tyler G. Morales

Tyler G. Morales
Badge #3445, Hispanic Male
Sergeant at Internal Affairs Bureau since June 2026
Also served at 30th Precinct, Patrol Borough Manhattan North Public Safety Teams, 34th Precinct
Service started January 2017, made $184,000 last year, Tax #963169
tyler.morales@nypd.org

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Stop

Complaints

8 Complaints
17 Allegations
4 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Unavailable
2 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
8 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202512152, December 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202503401, April 2025
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202500103, January 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202410555, October 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202405412, May 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202403438, March 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202400315, December 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202311939, December 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to Explain
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202512152, December 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Male, 21-24 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202503401, April 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Female Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202500103, January 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Other Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202410555, October 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 40-44 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202405412, May 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Male, 15-17 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic Female, 30-34 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Male, 15-17 Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #202403438, March 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202400315, December 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #202311939, December 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 18-20 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Failure to Explain Black Male, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Mendoza, Leonardo vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 154572/2021, Supreme Court - New York, May 12, 2021
Complaint
Description: On or about June 8, 2019, the Plaintiff, a Hispanic/Latino male, had been lawfully operating his vehicle when the driver of the vehicle in front of him accused him of bumping the rear of her vehicle and demanded money to settle the purported accident claim. The Defendant officers, including P.O. Everett, P.O. Morales, and John or Jane Doe 1-10, approached the Plaintiff and the aforesaid driver, and attempted to intimidate the Plaintiff into paying the aforesaid driver. The Defendant officers unlawfully targeted the Plaintiff due to his race/ethnicity. Despite the Plaintiff explaining that he did not bump the vehicle, that he would prefer to deal with the purported accident claim through insurance and that he di...

Other Documents

DA Disclosure Letter