Omar M. Habib

Omar M. Habib

Omar M. Habib
Badge #748, White Male, 41
Police Officer at Police Service Area 5 VIPER since February 2026
Service started January 2007, made $125,000 last year, Tax #942899

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Chokehold
Force: Physical force (2)
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal)
Abuse of Authority: Stop (2)
Discourtesy: Word (3)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2018-19116
Closed: 4/5/2019
Case: 2010-2466
Closed: 6/28/2011

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$744,000   Prewitt, Dennis L. vs City of New York, et al., 2019 BCSC BCSC 027825/2019E
$90,000   Casado, Storm vs City of New York, et al., 2019 BCSC BCSC 026173/2019E
$20,000   Mcbride, Judon vs City of New York, et al., 2017 BCSC BCSC 022491/2017E
View Details

Complaints

7 Complaints
18 Allegations
10 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
4 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
3 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202206430, September 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202204339, July 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Age 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202204302, June 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, March 27, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201902427, March 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Penalty: Instructions
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201801230, November 2017
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 55
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Male, 55
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 55
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Previously adjudicated, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Previously adjudicated, with discipline, September 27, 2020
Penalty: Dismissal Probation 365 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201602469, March 2016
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 53
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 53
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 53
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #200914904, September 2009
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Allegation: Force: Handcuffs too tight
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: Charges and Specifications - Guilty
Penalty: Vacation: 35 days / Suspension: 5 days
additional details

Complaint #202206430, September 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202204339, July 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Age 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202204302, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal) Hispanic Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, March 27, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201902427, March 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 26 Exonerated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 26 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 26 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 26 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 26 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Black Male, 26 Unfounded
Penalty: Instructions
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201801230, November 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 55 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Chokehold Black Male, 55 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 55 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Previously adjudicated, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Previously adjudicated, with discipline, September 27, 2020
Penalty: Dismissal Probation 365 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201602469, March 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Hispanic Male, 53 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 53 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Hispanic Male, 53 Exonerated
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #200914904, September 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 40 Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Force: Handcuffs too tight Hispanic Male, 40 Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: Charges and Specifications - Guilty
Penalty: Vacation: 35 days / Suspension: 5 days
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2018-19116
Closed: 4/5/2019
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on duty, wrongfully failed to document force accurately on a threat, resistance or injury (t.r.i.) incident worksheet, as required.
  2. Guilty: While on-duty, wrongfully used force to a person known to the Department.
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), vacation days (30 days)

Case: 2010-2466
Closed: 6/28/2011
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on duty, did use unnecessary physical force against a person known to the Department without police necessity.
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), suspended w/o pay (5 days), vacation days (35 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 6 known lawsuits, $854,000 total settlements.

Mcintosh, Albert vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 030728/2020E, Supreme Court - Bronx, October 1, 2020
Complaint
Description: On November 17, 2019, Plaintiff was lawfully on the street when he was approached by officers. The officers misidentified Plaintiff and immediately restrained him through the use of force. Plaintiff was transported to the precinct and was confined for 12 hours.

Valentin, Angel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 022972/2020E, Supreme Court - Bronx, March 5, 2020
Complaint
Description: On or about September 2, 2016 PO Omar Habib, Det. Antonio Esparra, Det. Michael Caridi, PO Daisy Gonzalez, and PO Ingoglio wrongfully accused Plaintiff of various possession charges, falsely handcuffed, threatened, and arrested him, and detained him in the precinct, Central Booking, and Riker's Island. They further testified falsely to the Grand Jury and perjured themselves at trial. Proceedings terminated in favor of the Plaintiff.

Prewitt, Dennis L. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 027825/2019E, Supreme Court - Bronx, July 12, 2019, ended November 19, 2024
$744,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: That on or about November 23, 2017 the defendants wrongfully assaulted and injured the Plaintiff while they were investigating a matter in the building he resides in. Defendant POlice Officers Christopher Pruner, Malik Muhammad deliberately and maliciously assaulted and injured Plaintiff by holding him in a choke hold, tasing and injuring him, an innocent male without any probable cause. These injuries caused plaintiff to be admitted to Lincoln hospital. Plaintiff still suffers and, upon information and belief will continue to suffer, great indignities, humiliation and ridicule; was greatly injured to his credit and circumstances; was prevented from performing and transacting his necessary affairs and business...

Casado, Storm vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 026173/2019E, Supreme Court - Bronx, June 11, 2019, ended November 27, 2024
$90,000 Settlement

Hernandez, Angel & Garcia, Ana vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 18CV06418, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, April 8, 2019, ended February 2, 2022
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On March 29th or 30th, 2018, Plaintiff and his wife were assaulted by six P.O.s from the 40th Precinct. The officers falsely arrested Plaintiff while Security at Diego Beekman Housing watched and did not intervene. During the incident, Plaintiff was knocked down three times, and Plaintiff’s wife was knocked out.

Mcbride, Judon vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 022491/2017E, Supreme Court - Bronx, April 6, 2017, ended September 26, 2019
$20,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On October 20, 2016, Plaintiff was lawfully present at 140th Street and Saint Anns Avenue in the Bronx when Defendant officers approached and requested identification. Plaintiff was subsequently handcuffed, arrested and taken to the 40th precinct without being informed of the charges against him. On October 21, 2016, Plaintiff was transferred to Central Booking but was not presented before a judge. He was released from Central Booking on the same day.

Other Documents