Named in 2 known lawsuits.
Mitchell, Adrian vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 502651/2014,
Supreme Court - Kings, May 23, 2018
Complaint
Description: On or about the evening of June 12, 2013, Petitioner Adrian Mitchell was at home with her five-year-old son when three NYPD officers-including, upon information and belief, Respondents Police Officers CHARLES , JOHN DOE, and JANE DOE- knocked on Petitioner’s door. The NYPD Officers informed Petitioner that she must accompany them to the 79th Precinct because her son’s father, NYPD Officer Brodie, made a complaint that she threatened him. At the precinct, Petitioner was brought to an interrogation room and told that she was under arrested and that she should make arrangements for someone to pick up her son. Petitioner’s husband’s allegations against her were false, and other NYDP officers conspired with Officer ...
Mitchell, Adrian vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV06976,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, December 15, 2015, ended February 13, 2018
Zero Disposition
Amended Complaint,
Complaint
Description: Defendant officer Broadie is the father of Plaintiff's son. After Plaintiff and Officer Broadie exchanged emails regarding custody of their son, Officer Broadie went to the 79th Precinct and complained that Plaintiff threatened him, resulting in Plaintiff's arrest. Officer CHARLES provided plaintiff with a Domestic Incident Report (ìDIRî) and Plaintiff was released later that day. The DIR stated that the Internal Affairs Bureau (ìIABî) was notified about Officer Broadie's false report because he was an active member of service but IAB has given Plaintiff conflicting information about the investigation. Plaintiff was also told that the 79th Precinct Inspector had interviewed Officer BRODIE regarding the false re...