Raymon Martinez

Badge #3993, Hispanic Male
Sergeant at Central Park Precinct since July 2024
Also served at 44th Precinct, 40th Precinct
Service started July 2013, made $164,000 last year, Tax #955138

Lawsuit Settlements:
$40,000   Lopez, Uriel vs Martinez, Raymond, et al., 2020 BCSC BCSC 026829/2020
$30,000   Benitez, Derrick vs City of Ny, et al., 2019 BCSC BCSC 022010/2019E
View Details


Discipline

Case: 2019-21131
Closed: 4/14/2020
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: Associate with known criminals.
  2. Pleaded Guilty: Misuse of dept property for personal gain.
Penalty: Vacation days (25 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits, $70,000 total settlements.

Aponte, Steven vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 800035/2021, Supreme Court - Bronx, January 4, 2021
Complaint
Description: On November 17, 2021, plaintiff and two friends were in a car rented by their friend Piantini, who was not in the vehicle. In the vicinity of Fordham Road and University Avenue, they were stopped by defendant police officers, who directed the occupants to exit the car and informed them that the car was reported stolen. Plaintiff and his two friends explained to the officers that they had permission to be inside and operate the vehicle, and minutes later Piantini and the owner of the car also arrived at the scene to confirm the same. Despite knowing that plaintiff did not engage in unlawful behaviors, defendant officer Martinez handcuffed and arrested plaintiff and his two friends. Plaintiff was transported to t...

Lopez, Uriel vs Martinez, Raymond, et al.
Case # 026829/2020, Supreme Court - Bronx, July 14, 2020, ended December 18, 2021
$40,000 Settlement

Benitez, Derrick vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 022010/2019E, Supreme Court - Bronx, March 7, 2019, ended May 22, 2026
$30,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On November 21, 2017, plaintiff was driving down the road, when his vehicle was stopped by defendant POs Martinez and Does without any probable cause. Defendant POs subsequently arrested the plaintiff accusing him of driving a stolen vehicle. Even after the owner of the car had informed defendant POs that plaintiff was lawfully leasing the car from him, they proceeded to falsely charge plaintiff with grand larceny, criminal possession of stolen property and unauthorised use of a vehicle. After numerous court appearances, the charges were dismissed upon application of the District Attorney.