Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Discourtesy: Word (3)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Discourtesy: Word (3)
Andrew P. Camarda
Badge #15757,
Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 61st Precinct since April 2026
Service
started October 2015,
made $164,000 last year,
Tax #959529
Complaints
2
Complaints
5
Allegations
4
Substantiated
4
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202502902,
March 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202303773,
May 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | White Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | White Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
| Complaint #202502902, March 2025 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Female, 30-34 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202303773, May 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | White Male, 21-24 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Discourtesy: Word | White Male, 18-20 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Discourtesy: Word | White Male, 21-24 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 21-24 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Penhasov, Levi vs City of New York, et al.Case # 18CV01825, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, April 4, 2018, ended November 18, 2020
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On July 15, 2017, Plaintiff Levi Penhasov was arrested outside of a store. When asked why he was being arrested, Plaintiff was not given a reason. Defendant P.O. Hepworth told Plaintiff to stand next to the police car while he was handcuffed. As plaintiff was standing there, a man sitting in the back seat of the car reached out and punched Plaintiff twice. Plaintiff immediately complained and asked to file charges against the individual who had just struck him. Defendants laughed and ignored the complaint. One officer told Plaintiff the man in the car was accusing him of assault. Plaintiff denied this and people who had just been with him corroborated this. Eventually, Sgt. Helton arrived on the scene and appro...