Complaint #200000254, January 2000

Incident: January 12, 2000
Closed: November 8, 2000

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - bldg
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 48th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Michael Golino, Patrick Hickey, Thomas Menkes

Officer:	Swenson, Kevin
Complainant:	Hispanic Female, 36
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Swenson, Kevin
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer:	Swenson, Kevin
Complainant:	Hispanic Female, 36
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Cunningham, Gerard
Complainant:	Hispanic Female, 36
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Swenson, Kevin
Complainant:	Hispanic Female, 36
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Swenson, Kevin
Complainant:	Hispanic Female, 36
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline)

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Swenson, Kevin	Hispanic Female, 36	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Swenson, Kevin		Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Swenson, Kevin	Hispanic Female, 36	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Cunningham, Gerard	Hispanic Female, 36	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Swenson, Kevin	Hispanic Female, 36	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Exonerated
Swenson, Kevin	Hispanic Female, 36	Abuse of Authority: Other	Substantiated (Command Discipline)

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.