Complaint #200000678, February 2000

Incident: February 9, 2000
Closed: April 11, 2001

Reason for contact: Report-dispute
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 71st Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - assault (against a PO)

Witness Officers: Esther Bacchi, Giovanni Cascio, Jason Harris, Gregory Kenny, Mark Schoberl

Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Female
Allegation:	Force: Pepper spray
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Female
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Christ, Thomas
Complainant:	Black Male
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Mcsharry, Kieran
Complainant:	Black Female
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Manwaring, Kurvin
Complainant:	Black Female
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Caggia, Francesco
Complainant:	Black Male
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Troise, Robert
Complainant:	Black Male
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Budimlic, Nikolas
Complainant:	Black Male
Allegation:	Force: Pepper spray
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer	Black Female	Force: Pepper spray	Officer(s) Unidentified
Unknown Officer	Black Female	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Christ, Thomas	Black Male	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Mcsharry, Kieran	Black Female	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Manwaring, Kurvin	Black Female	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Caggia, Francesco	Black Male	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Troise, Robert	Black Male	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Budimlic, Nikolas	Black Male	Force: Pepper spray	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.