Complaint #200008343, November 2000

Incident: November 25, 2000
Received: December 1, 2000
Closed: March 20, 2002

Reason for contact: Moving violation
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 9th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Moving violation summons issued

Officer:	Bloom, Joel
Complainant:	Hispanic Female, 23
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Bloom, Joel
Complainant:	Hispanic Female, 23
Allegation:	Force: Other
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Bloom, Joel
Complainant:	Hispanic Female, 23
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Bloom, Joel
Complainant:	Hispanic Female, 23
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Allen, Edward
Complainant:	Hispanic Female, 23
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Smith, Christopher
Complainant:	Hispanic Female, 23
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Smith, Christopher
Complainant:	Black Male, 20
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Bloom, Joel	Hispanic Female, 23	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Bloom, Joel	Hispanic Female, 23	Force: Other	Exonerated
Bloom, Joel	Hispanic Female, 23	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Exonerated
Bloom, Joel	Hispanic Female, 23	Abuse of Authority: Other	Unsubstantiated
Allen, Edward	Hispanic Female, 23	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Unsubstantiated
Smith, Christopher	Hispanic Female, 23	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Exonerated
Smith, Christopher	Black Male, 20	Force: Physical force	Unfounded

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.