Complaint #200008962,
December 18, 2000

Officer: Siev, David
Complainant: Black Male, 18
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Siev, David
Complainant: Black Male, 18
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Siev, David
Complainant: Black Male, 17
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Siev, David
Complainant: Black Male, 16
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Johnston, Herbert
Complainant: Black Male, 17
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Johnston, Herbert
Complainant: Black Male, 16
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Malkoff, Scott
Complainant: Black Male, 16
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Malkoff, Scott
Complainant: Black Male, 17
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Johnston, Herbert
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Unfounded
CCRB Board Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Board Conclusion
Siev, David Black Male, 18 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Siev, David Black Male, 18 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Siev, David Black Male, 17 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Siev, David Black Male, 16 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Johnston, Herbert Black Male, 17 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Johnston, Herbert Black Male, 16 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Malkoff, Scott Black Male, 16 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Malkoff, Scott Black Male, 17 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Unknown Officer Black Male, 15-17 Force: Physical force Unfounded
Johnston, Herbert Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn Exonerated
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Unfounded

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Details

Incident: December 18, 2000
Received: December 29, 2000
Closed: November 29, 2001

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 67th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - assault (against a PO)

Witness Officers: James Bogacki