Complaint #200100713, January 2001

Incident: January 27, 2001
Received: February 1, 2001
Closed: January 18, 2002


Reason for contact: Other
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 30th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued
Officer: Judge, Kevin
Complainant: White Male, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Roadarmel, Carl
Complainant: White Male, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Roadarmel, Carl
Complainant: White Male, 21
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: White Male, 21-24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer: Ingram, Michael
Complainant: White Male, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Roadarmel, Carl
Complainant: White Male, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Ingram, Michael
Complainant: White Male, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Judge, Kevin White Male, 22 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Exonerated
Roadarmel, Carl White Male, 22 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Exonerated
Roadarmel, Carl White Male, 21 Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search Exonerated
Unknown Officer White Male, 21-24 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Ingram, Michael White Male, 22 Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search Exonerated
Roadarmel, Carl White Male, 22 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Exonerated
Ingram, Michael White Male, 22 Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.