Complaint #200105076, June 2001

Incident: June 28, 2001
Received: July 10, 2001
Closed: October 1, 2002


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Subway station/train
In NYPD 70th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Ariel Anglin, Alicia Barrett, Matthew Chapman, Floretta Chow, Joseph Conde, David Console, Craig Contrera, Hans Francois, Robert Henderson, Nathaniel King, Nicholas Lagano, John Lomando, Anthony Mccrystal, Kenneth Quick, Eric Ruppert, Joseph Scaffidi, Antonio Thomas, Carl Watson, Jerome Whitehurst
Officer: Prior, Clarence
Complainant: Black Male, 25
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Prior, Clarence
Complainant: Black Male, 25
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Prior, Clarence
Complainant: Black Male, 25
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Royall, Kevin
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Mctiernan, Daniel
Complainant: Black Male, 27
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Williams, Gerald
Complainant: Black Male, 25
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Prior, Clarence
Complainant: Black Male, 25
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Murray, Cicero
Complainant: Black Male, 27
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Murray, Cicero
Complainant: Black Male, 25
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Murray, Cicero
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Murray, Cicero
Complainant: Black Male, 25
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Prior, Clarence Black Male, 25 Force: Physical force Substantiated (Charges)
Prior, Clarence Black Male, 25 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Substantiated (Charges)
Prior, Clarence Black Male, 25 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Force: Physical force Officer(s) Unidentified
Royall, Kevin Force: Physical force Substantiated (Charges)
Mctiernan, Daniel Black Male, 27 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Williams, Gerald Black Male, 25 Force: Pepper spray Exonerated
Prior, Clarence Black Male, 25 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Substantiated (Charges)
Murray, Cicero Black Male, 27 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest Unsubstantiated
Murray, Cicero Black Male, 25 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest Unsubstantiated
Murray, Cicero Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest Substantiated (Charges)
Unknown Officer Black Male, 25-29 Force: Pepper spray Officer(s) Unidentified
Unknown Officer Black Male, 25-29 Force: Pepper spray Officer(s) Unidentified
Murray, Cicero Black Male, 25 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Unknown Officer Black Male, 25-29 Force: Physical force Officer(s) Unidentified

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.