Complaint #200203730, May 2002

Incident: May 31, 2002
Received: June 5, 2002
Closed: December 30, 2002


Reason for contact: Report of other crime
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 40th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Joseph Donza, Antoine Foret, Daniel Howell, Guillerm Intriago, Robert Mccann, Fred Rivera
Officer: Spiekermann, Joseph
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Unknown Officer
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Female
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Spiekermann, Joseph Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Charges)
Unknown Officer Offensive Language: Race Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Female Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Exonerated
Unknown Officer Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Exonerated

Penalty

Spiekermann, Joseph
Instructions


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.