Complaint #200203972, June 2002

Incident: June 13, 2002
Received: June 14, 2002
Closed: July 14, 2003


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 102nd Precinct Queens
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Patrick Abdul, Vincent Hoosack
Officer: Kraemer, Edward
Complainant: White Female, 35
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Kraemer, Edward
Complainant: White Female, 35
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Gallashaw, Edward
Complainant: White Male, 16
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Gallashaw, Edward
Complainant: White Male, 16
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Gallashaw, Edward
Complainant: White Male, 16
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Gallashaw, Edward
Complainant: White Male, 16
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Kraemer, Edward White Female, 35 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Kraemer, Edward White Female, 35 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Substantiated (Charges)
Gallashaw, Edward White Male, 16 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Gallashaw, Edward White Male, 16 Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search Exonerated
Gallashaw, Edward White Male, 16 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Exonerated
Gallashaw, Edward White Male, 16 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Exonerated

Penalty

Kraemer, Edward
Command Discipline - A


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.