Complaint #200204099, June 2002

Incident: June 16, 2002
Received: June 20, 2002
Closed: December 2, 2002


Reason for contact: C/V telephoned PCT
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 20th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Joseph Beadle, Robert Downes, William Mcvey, Donald Ringhauser, Jared Wendt
Officer: French, Christopher
Complainant: White Male, 48
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: French, Christopher
Complainant: White Female, 36
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: French, Christopher
Complainant: White Male, 48
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Batista, Frank
Complainant: White Female, 36
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Batista, Frank
Complainant: White Male, 48
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Padilla, Kisha
Complainant: White Female, 36
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
French, Christopher White Male, 48 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unfounded
French, Christopher White Female, 36 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Exonerated
French, Christopher White Male, 48 Discourtesy: Word Unfounded
Batista, Frank White Female, 36 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Exonerated
Batista, Frank White Male, 48 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unfounded
Padilla, Kisha White Female, 36 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.