Complaint #200208332, December 2002

Incident: December 5, 2002
Received: December 12, 2002
Closed: July 9, 2003


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 75th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Gary Anderson, Michael Howell, Daniel Miraglia, Mauro Sciancalepore
Officer: Kondenar, Gregory
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Kondenar, Gregory
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Kondenar, Gregory
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Michelini, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Michelini, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Michelini, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Walsh, Sean
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Kondenar, Gregory Black Male, 33 Force: Gun Pointed Unfounded
Kondenar, Gregory Black Male, 33 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Kondenar, Gregory Black Male, 33 Discourtesy: Word Unfounded
Michelini, Michael Black Male, 33 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Unfounded
Michelini, Michael Black Male, 33 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Michelini, Michael Black Male, 33 Force: Pepper spray Exonerated
Walsh, Sean Black Male, 33 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Unknown Officer Black Male, 30-34 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.