Complaint #200300353, January 2003

Incident: January 12, 2003
Received: January 14, 2003
Closed: March 30, 2004


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 47th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Annmarie Ennis, Diane Hornung
Officer: Unknown Officer
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Maraldo, Vincent
Complainant: Black Male, 17
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Maraldo, Vincent
Complainant: Black Male, 16
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Osullivan, James
Complainant: Black Male, 64
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Osullivan, James
Complainant: Black Male, 16
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Osullivan, James
Complainant: Black Male, 16
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Maraldo, Vincent
Complainant: Black Male, 16
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
Maraldo, Vincent Black Male, 17 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Maraldo, Vincent Black Male, 16 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Osullivan, James Black Male, 64 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Osullivan, James Black Male, 16 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Unsubstantiated
Osullivan, James Black Male, 16 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Maraldo, Vincent Black Male, 16 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.