Complaint #200300978, February 2003

Incident: February 6, 2003
Received: February 7, 2003
Closed: September 15, 2003


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 48th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: Kim Worthy
Officer: Mccrossen, John
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 53
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Mojica, Wesley
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 25
Allegation: Discourtesy: Demeanor/tone
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
Officer: Bracken, Thomas
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 53
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Bracken, Thomas
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 53
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Bracken, Thomas
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 53
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Bracken, Thomas
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 53
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Mccrossen, John Hispanic Male, 53 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Unsubstantiated
Mojica, Wesley Hispanic Female, 25 Discourtesy: Demeanor/tone Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
Bracken, Thomas Hispanic Male, 53 Abuse of Authority: Other Substantiated (Charges)
Bracken, Thomas Hispanic Male, 53 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Substantiated (Charges)
Bracken, Thomas Hispanic Male, 53 Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search Substantiated (Charges)
Bracken, Thomas Hispanic Male, 53 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Unsubstantiated

Penalty

Bracken, Thomas
Charge Dismissed - DCT
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.