Complaint #200301228, February 2003

Incident: February 16, 2003
Closed: May 19, 2004

Reason for contact: Other
Location: Other
In NYPD 48th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: Shavon Johnson

Officer:	Ortiz, Julio
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Ortiz, Julio
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Ortiz, Julio
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Sanchez, Israel
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Sanchez, Israel
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Sanchez, Israel
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Ortiz, Julio
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Ortiz, Julio	Black Male, 25	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Ortiz, Julio	Black Male, 25	Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest	Exonerated
Ortiz, Julio	Black Male, 25	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unsubstantiated
Sanchez, Israel	Black Male, 25	Force: Gun Pointed	Unsubstantiated
Sanchez, Israel	Black Male, 25	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Exonerated
Sanchez, Israel	Black Male, 25	Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search	Exonerated
Ortiz, Julio	Black Male, 25	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.