Complaint #200302175, March 2003

Incident: March 20, 2003
Received: March 24, 2003
Closed: May 21, 2004


Reason for contact: Parking violation
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 28th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: William Aberger, Eric Bergstrom, Edward Carey, Jack Franzitta, Rajiv Khurana, Michael Mcnamara, Paul Nyland, Timothy Panzenbeck, Vilma Wagner
Officer: Gantt, Jeffrey
Complainant: Black Female, 25
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Gantt, Jeffrey
Complainant: Black Female, 25
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Gantt, Jeffrey
Complainant: Black Male, 21
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Scott, Paul
Complainant: Black Female, 25
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Wilbekin, Mark
Complainant: Black Female, 25
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Owens, Mary
Complainant: Black Female, 25
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Gantt, Jeffrey Black Female, 25 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Gantt, Jeffrey Black Female, 25 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest Exonerated
Gantt, Jeffrey Black Male, 21 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Scott, Paul Black Female, 25 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Wilbekin, Mark Black Female, 25 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Owens, Mary Black Female, 25 Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Substantiated (Charges)

Penalty

Owens, Mary
Instructions


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.