Complaint #200302675, April 2003

Incident: April 8, 2003
Received: April 12, 2003
Closed: July 15, 2004


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 9th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Timothy Fenfert, Jaime Varcoe
Officer: Lonergan, Kevin
Complainant: White Female, 45
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Lonergan, Kevin
Complainant: White Female, 45
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Lonergan, Kevin
Complainant: White Female, 45
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Lonergan, Kevin
Complainant: White Female, 45
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Lonergan, Kevin
Complainant: White Female, 45
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Lonergan, Kevin White Female, 45 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Lonergan, Kevin White Female, 45 Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Unsubstantiated
Lonergan, Kevin White Female, 45 Force: Hit against inanimate object Unsubstantiated
Lonergan, Kevin White Female, 45 Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Charges)
Lonergan, Kevin White Female, 45 Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Unsubstantiated

Penalty

Lonergan, Kevin
Charge Dismissed - DCT
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.