Complaint #200302922, April 2003

Incident: April 18, 2003
Received: April 22, 2003
Closed: March 30, 2004


Reason for contact: Report-dispute
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 90th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Joyce Ahern, Elvin Almonte, Christophe Bottcher, Harold King, Mark Wachter
Officer: Smith, Osbourne
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 19
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Wilson, Randy
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 19
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Wilson, Randy
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 19
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Loccisano, Robert
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 19
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Wilson, Randy
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 19
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Loccisano, Robert
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 19
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Loccisano, Robert
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 19
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Smith, Osbourne Hispanic Male, 19 Force: Hit against inanimate object Exonerated
Wilson, Randy Hispanic Male, 19 Force: Hit against inanimate object Unfounded
Wilson, Randy Hispanic Male, 19 Force: Chokehold Unfounded
Loccisano, Robert Hispanic Male, 19 Offensive Language: Race Unfounded
Wilson, Randy Hispanic Male, 19 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Loccisano, Robert Hispanic Male, 19 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Loccisano, Robert Hispanic Male, 19 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.