Complaint #200308038, October 2003

Incident: October 5, 2003
Received: October 14, 2003
Closed: November 10, 2004

Reason for contact: Other
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 40th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: Kegham Jarjokian, Peter Marter, Adam Pieragostini

Officer:	Stroman, Donald
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 15
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Stroman, Donald
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 15
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Martinez, Moises
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 15
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 18-20
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 15-17
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 18-20
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 18-20
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Stroman, Donald	Hispanic Male, 15	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Stroman, Donald	Hispanic Male, 15	Discourtesy: Word	Exonerated
Martinez, Moises	Hispanic Male, 15	Discourtesy: Word	Unfounded
Unknown Officer	Hispanic Male, 18-20	Force: Physical force	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Unknown Officer	Hispanic Male, 15-17	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Unknown Officer	Hispanic Male, 18-20	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer	Hispanic Male, 18-20	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.