Complaint #200403449, April 2004

Incident: April 15, 2004
Received: April 16, 2004
Closed: June 16, 2005

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 71st Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Officer:	Hamer, Clarence
Complainant:	Black Male, 20
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Hamer, Clarence
Complainant:	Black Male, 20
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Humphrey, Ronald
Complainant:	Black Male, 20
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Humphrey, Ronald
Complainant:	Black Male, 20
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Hamer, Clarence
Complainant:	Black Male, 20
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Hamer, Clarence	Black Male, 20	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Hamer, Clarence	Black Male, 20	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Exonerated
Humphrey, Ronald	Black Male, 20	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Exonerated
Humphrey, Ronald	Black Male, 20	Force: Physical force	Unfounded
Hamer, Clarence	Black Male, 20	Abuse of Authority: Frisk	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.