Complaint #200408066, August 2004

Incident: August 19, 2004
Closed: June 30, 2006


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - bldg
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 43rd Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Jeannie Corporan, Christophe George, Andrew Macelhinney
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Dominguez, Freddy
Complainant: Black Male, 26
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Caciano, Joseph
Complainant: Black Male, 26
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Caciano, Joseph
Complainant: Black Female, 30
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Caciano, Joseph
Complainant: Black Female, 30
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Quiles, Wilson
Complainant: Black Male, 26
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Quiles, Wilson
Complainant: Black Male, 26
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer Black Female, 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Officer(s) Unidentified
Dominguez, Freddy Black Male, 26 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Exonerated
Caciano, Joseph Black Male, 26 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Exonerated
Caciano, Joseph Black Female, 30 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Unsubstantiated
Caciano, Joseph Black Female, 30 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Quiles, Wilson Black Male, 26 Discourtesy: Word Unfounded
Quiles, Wilson Black Male, 26 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Unfounded

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.