Complaint #200504261, April 2005

Incident: April 19, 2005
Received: April 20, 2005
Closed: June 21, 2006


Location: Subway station/train
In NYPD 19th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Richard Schreiner
Officer: Longmaid, Scott
Complainant: Black Male, 16
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Longmaid, Scott
Complainant: Black Male, 16
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Johnson, Brendan
Complainant: Black Male, 16
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Cutrone, Joseph
Complainant: Black Male, 16
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Cutrone, Joseph
Complainant: Black Male, 16
Allegation: Force: Radio as club
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Longmaid, Scott
Complainant: Black Male, 16
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Cutrone, Joseph
Complainant: Black Male, 16
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Longmaid, Scott Black Male, 16 Force: Pepper spray Exonerated
Longmaid, Scott Black Male, 16 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Johnson, Brendan Black Male, 16 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Cutrone, Joseph Black Male, 16 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Cutrone, Joseph Black Male, 16 Force: Radio as club Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Black Male, 15-17 Force: Physical force Officer(s) Unidentified
Longmaid, Scott Black Male, 16 Abuse of Authority: Other Exonerated
Cutrone, Joseph Black Male, 16 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.